There have been suggestions the wrong prevalent in the world.
Some suggest that nothing actually gets to the event horizon.
We understand the term "frozen stars" refers to the situation that when things approach the speed of light time slows such that objects with mass can never quite reach C. This results in time becoming frozen from many perspectives at the event horizon.
The other thing that happens as things get faster is they become more wavelike or smeared
The other thing that happens as things get faster is they become more wavelike or smeared
Relativity however also says that from any freely floating frame the same laws of physics should normally apply, so from the point of view of the person falling into a black hole they should not notice any sudden strangeness. Admittedly small black holes can have major gavitational differences that may turn a person into spaghetti, but supposedly one as large as the black hole in the center of our milky way galaxy the trip may be smooth enough to survive the transit beyond the event horizon. Falling over niagra falls can be less painful than being sucked through a bath plug or window of a presurized jet. Likewise passing the event horizon may feel totally normal until you likly get crushed near the singularity.
Relativity and time dilation can get confusing at the best of times, but as any good relativistic scientist knows when we enter black holes the math gets extra complicated; Then try to introduce quantum aspects and you may have a brain meltdown.
Relativity and time dilation can get confusing at the best of times, but as any good relativistic scientist knows when we enter black holes the math gets extra complicated; Then try to introduce quantum aspects and you may have a brain meltdown.
Although Benji does not use the precise mathematical foralisms by Bekenstein and Hawking or even that of Susskind,
the work of such experts in Holographic Information have at least inspired or guided our investigations.
Our approach is mostly an alegorious one, and as Leonard Susskind says: "all analogies have their limitations".
the work of such experts in Holographic Information have at least inspired or guided our investigations.
Our approach is mostly an alegorious one, and as Leonard Susskind says: "all analogies have their limitations".
In Graham's explanation of Hawking radiation we assume the world is virtual much like Raspanti's Virtualism. We assume the real world might be 1D bitstream (or other lower dimension that the apparent world). We assume the higher dimensional worlds such as our 4D+ spacetime are "holographic projections" (as we define the term).


Post a Comment